I haven't seen this question brought up before.

To make sure WTC #7 's preplanned rigged controlled demolition did not look to be obvious (with no plane hitting it obviously), the perps would have to gaurantee that there would be fires.

None of the guilty subjects involved could know for sure that there would be debris large enough to strike the building.And even though that ended up being the case, I still believe that government insiders torched various floors before evacuating the building and that also would explain the delay in the collapse in occuring.They had to make it look legit.

Oddly enough, why would there be fires on various different floors anyway? Did any official report been released by the fire dept or NIST specifically explaining such details? The answer is no.

In a documentary called IMPROBABLE COLLAPSE, an Emergency worker states that the reason most firefighters keep their mouths closed on the subject is due to the threat from the highest levels of the FDNY of them being fired.

He went on to say that "the firefighters and the police know that this was an inside job by the U.S. government".

FreewayRickyRoss posted a link to a video of WTC 7 while it was burning but before it collapsed. In that video you can see a semicircle shaped hole carved out of one side of the building from roof to ground. It looked like the cylindrical holes seen in WTC3,5 and 6 only instead of being inside the building, it is along the side of the building, but thru all 47 floors. Unlike the damage to WTC 3,5 and 6, this damage would have been apparent to anyone, not just from above the building. After seeing this, I suspect that the perps had to bring down 7 before the smoke cleared or everyone would have seen this odd, inexplicable damage. The official story for those who did see it is that an antenna from one of the towers sliced thru 7, from roof to ground, as the tower was collapsing. Anyone that actually saw the damage would doubt the antenna story. That's 47 ceiling/floors as well as a 47 story outer wall. One hell of an antenna.

FRR:

Can you post that link again?

Not only were there fires after the collapses, it appears that there were a couple of fires on the southside of the building BEFORE the collapses.







Same pic as above with color manipulation.

Thanks Bus and Wonder.I have to find Ross's link to watch it again.

Firemen & cops know that 9/11 was an inside job
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVnvC0WNZHM&feature=user

Firefighters,1st responders as witnesses.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CHr0tlog9Q

This official story about the attenna is from the NIST report released today?
If so, that is pathetic.


Thanks Bus and Wonder.I have to find Ross's link to watch it again.

Firemen & cops know that 9/11 was an inside job
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVnvC0WNZHM&feature=user

Firefighters,1st responders as witnesses.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CHr0tlog9Q

NIST site says the rebroadcast of the report will be aired on their site tomorrow but the Q&A site was updated today.

Last updated: 8/21/08

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factshe..._qa_082108.html

Read this Q&A on NO witnesses reporting sounds of explosions.

Did investigators consider the possibility that an explosion caused or contributed to the collapse of WTC 7?

Yes, this possibility was investigated carefully. NIST concluded that blast events inside the building did not occur and found no evidence supporting the existence of a blast event.

In addition, no blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of video recordings during the collapse of WTC 7 or reported by witnesses.


THIS IS RIDICULOUS.NO WITNESSES REPORTED EXPLOSIONS? WHO IS THIS GUY BELOW? CHOP LIVER?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YhQq1W4cok

We know that there is eyewitness testimony, but based on this picture, I don't think conventional means such as demolition charges and/or arson can explain WTC7.