http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080729_acts_of_war/

Change the title of your thread, and stop using offensive langauge that has obvious racial undertones, It is against the rules, read them and obey them.



InvisionFree's main rules (read all of InvisionFree's rules here):

3.1 Prohibited Content:
Users may not post, upload, link to, or email any Content that contains, promotes, gives instruction about, or provides prohibited Content. Prohibited Content includes any Content that breaks any local, state, county, national or international law. Prohibited Content also includes: (a) Content that infringes upon any rights (including, but not limited to, copyrights and trademarks);


(B) Abusive, threatening, defamatory, racist, or obscene Content;

There is nothing racist about hating a country or it's policies, if that's what you're getting at.

Do you not consider the title of this thread abusive? and obscene?

(cool.gif Abusive, threatening, defamatory, racist, or obscene Content;

No, I don't consider it abusive to anyone on this forum to say 'f**k <insert country here>". Although, using the word 'f**k' without Astrix could be considered obscene by definition. The bottom line is, we don't care about what people think or believe, what we care about is how you treat other members on this forum. Expressing a dislike or even hatred towards a country for their policies does not warrant moderator action in my opinion.

I find the word offensive, i am not a child and i know what the word says with or without asterix's

the word violates invision plus's rules, if i have to take this further i will have to adress them.
I have already asked you are you going to remove it or not?

Invisionfree*
http://invisionfree.com/report.php

Spinout, should Rachel Corries parnets be allowed to say f*ck Israel if they so choose? How about the survivors of the USS LIberty massacre?

http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ussliberty.html

In general, I am not an advocate of swearing to make a point yet I am reluctant to censor anyone for merely swearing but it IS a bit of a fine line. WHat say the members here on this particular instance.

What say you all?

Works for me.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/mi...all-880435.html


http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/07/2...oting-incident/

http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=...74&jumival=1978

http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=43005


http://www.ifamericansknew.org/

We could rename it to 'fudge Israel' :P

i am at a cross roads. although i can be understanding/empathetic, i am also frustrated with what i see happening in the world.

should native americans not say fuck white people? should black people not say fuck white people?

then again, i suppose an open minded native/african american is not going to be fed up with all whites.

any way SPINOUT, i will make an earnest effort to chill on the fuck word. however, i will not make you any promises. i have been kicked out of bars and abused
alcohol for the first time in my 45 years as of the last two years, and understand i am not doing myself any good with my frustrated behaviour, but then again, it does no good to be passive and polite. while the genocide that the united states, israel and england perpetrate on the world continues because people choose to be sad and polite and passive, rather than mad as hell who do not want to take it anymore.

my offensiveness has much more to do with my anger, than it does with trying to upset people.

then again, maybe i am wrong.

maybe i am trying to upset people, or else i never would have handed out thousands of d.v.d.s and flyers over the last 5 years.

we should be upset from our comfort zone. i think the spirits of the dead want us to speak for them.

maybe they are saying - where the fuck is the revolution?

I think the revolution is happening although in fits and spurts. As many here have already said, "It has to get worse before it gets beter". Well, it's about to get worse.

With our economy spiraling downward out of control and the attack of Iran looming larger by the day, something has GOT to give.

People, just continue spreading the news.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgGETrMMY9w

people will get suckered into thinking barrack obama will save them, or they will continue to think they can`t make a difference.

anyone who thinks their vote counts is a fool. democrats are cowardly slaves to their paychecks and masters, just like republicans.

swearing accents emotions. should we not be emotional, or should we be patient, and wait for something to give?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJs4UNZ3LFE

nancy pelosi peddles "equal pay for equal work", rather than impeachment, thus side stepping.

there is no tolerable excuse. the troops are ignorant murderers who are terrorists paid by terrorists.

allegedly, many congresspersons have dual citizenship with israel.

it should not get worse before it gets better. there should be no waiting anymore. 7 years is disgusting.

It's a stupid title and you sound like a 14-year-old. Why don't we also say 'F**K AMERICA!" and then jump on our little hamster wheels and consider the coup perps equivalent to their captive citizens? It's a chump analysis.

And you're not supposed to start drinking at 45. Stop drinking you pouter and get your own ###### together. You're not 21, when you should have been f**king up.



p.s. You're my best fwend!

###### the united states of america.

it is not a stupid title - israel paid for/ england built/ and the united states military is guarding an oil/gas pipeline connecting the caspian sea to the indian ocean. pakistan was willing to play ball, but afghanistan was not. this is why the u.s. military morons are in afghanistan.

people chose to be captive if they know the 911 truth and do nothing, thereafter.

i did not start drinking when i was 45. i wrote that this is the first time i abused alcohol. someone once told me people abuse alcohol when something is bothering them. people not giving enough of a damn after realizing 911 was a set up is certainly worth being annoyed.

i am not pouting(as in sad). i am angry. more people should be angry instead of sad. sadness, helplessness is the reaction i see in people who i turn onto the truth in regard to 911.

yes ozzy, i should stop drinking and i should find a means to destroy the haarp location in alaska, as well as stop idiots from having children when they are in high school, or joining the military.

thanks ozzy, but spare me the sarcasm.

Halliburton is right for his frustrations. This is a matter to be taken serious.

AIPAC is pushing us to war with Iran for Israel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nch43wy8Zb8

Ellsberg Explains Reality of US Foreign Policy to Kristol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIUSMLOmtQ8

200 Israeli's Spied in the U.S.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWpWc_suPWo

Pat Buchanan argues that much American "meddling" in the Middle East is not to protect the U.S. national interest but largely done to support Israel.

Buchanan has referred to Capitol Hill as "Israeli-occupied territory."

In 1991 he wrote Congress has become "a Parliament of Whores incapable of standing up for U.S. national interests if AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) is on the other end of the line."

He accuses Israel of spying on the U.S. in many instances other than the well-publicized case of Jonathan Pollard, about whom he wrote, "Israel suborned Jonathan Pollard to loot our secrets and refuses to return the documents, which would establish whether or not they were sold to Moscow. When Clinton tried to broker an agreement at Wye Plantation between Israel and Arafat, Bibi Netanyahu attempted to extort, as his price for signing, release of Pollard, so he could take this treasonous snake back to Israel as a national hero".


2001:Former Israel Prime Minister Ariel Sharon reportedly yelled at his foreign Minister Shimon Peres saying "don't worry about American pressure, we the Jewish people control America."

http://www.mediamonitors.net/khodr49.html

The Zionist are a very disturbed and depraved bunch of people not happy until they get what they want anway they can get it.
Always ready to defend the indefensible and think the unconscionable.
I REALLY despise these people and everything they stand for.
Israel and the jews that live there are nothing more than assets for emotional blackmail with the bonus of rabid Zionists thrown in for good measure.
Everything they do is based on a lie, ultimately using more lies to create situations so unnecessary you have to be a Zionist to see the benefits of them, that says a lot.
The way jewry has been radicalised makes them no better than radicalised jihadis, in fact worse because they try and pretend that what they do is within the law whereas the jihadis understand that they are using terrorist means to try and move their ideology forward not only in palestine but other places to.
9/11 and 7/7 both have fingerprints of zionism on them, Israel is the pet project of the bankers who hold governments to ransom.
What would they be without our money, probably on the same even playing field of weaponry as the other states around them, this mismatch that they goto so many lengths to protect proves two things.
THEY ARE BULLIES AND COWARDS! Gods own pussies. let god look after them!.


Speaking at the Campus Progress journalism conference earlier this month, Seymour Hersh — a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist for The New Yorker — revealed that Bush administration officials held a meeting recently in the Vice President’s office to discuss ways to provoke a war with Iran.


Hersh argued that one of the things the Bush administration learned during the encounter in the Strait of Hormuz was that, “if you get the right incident, the American public will support” it.

“Look, is it high school? Yeah,” Hersh said. “Are we playing high school with you know 5,000 nuclear warheads in our arsenal? Yeah we are. We’re playing, you know, who’s the first guy to run off the highway with us and Iran.”

Transcript:

HERSH: There was a meeting. Among the items considered and rejected — which is why the New Yorker did not publish it, on grounds that it wasn’t accepted — one of the items was why not…

There was a dozen ideas proffered about how to trigger a war. The one that interested me the most was why don’t we build — we in our shipyard — build four or five boats that look like Iranian PT boats. Put Navy seals on them with a lot of arms. And next time one of our boats goes to the Straits of Hormuz, start a shoot-up. Might cost some lives.

And it was rejected because you can’t have Americans killing Americans. That’s the kind of — that’s the level of stuff we’re talking about. Provocation. But that was rejected.

So I can understand the argument for not writing something that was rejected — uh maybe. My attitude always towards editors is they’re mice training to be rats.

But the point is jejune, if you know what that means. Silly? Maybe. But potentially very lethal. Because one of the things they learned in the incident was the American public, if you get the right incident, the American public will support bang-bang-kiss-kiss. You know, we’re into it.

…What happened in the Gulf was, in the Straits, in early January, the President was just about to go to the Middle East for a visit. So that was one reason they wanted to gin it up. Get it going.

Look, is it high school? Yeah. Are we playing high school with you know 5,000 nuclear warheads in our arsenal? Yeah we are. We’re playing, you know, who’s the first guy to run off the highway with us and Iran.


We’re playing, you know, who’s the first guy to run off the highway with us and Iran.

Does he mean they are playing "chicken" with iran......that says it all
:angry:
we must stop idiots like him from spouting this B O L L O X at the end of the day when the nukes start falling around the world he will be underground with the rest of the scum.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/18/opinion/...gin&oref=slogin

ISRAEL will almost surely attack Iran’s nuclear sites in the next four to seven months — and the leaders in Washington and even Tehran should hope that the attack will be successful enough to cause at least a significant delay in the Iranian production schedule, if not complete destruction, of that country’s nuclear program. Because if the attack fails, the Middle East will almost certainly face a nuclear war — either through a subsequent pre-emptive Israeli nuclear strike or a nuclear exchange shortly after Iran gets the bomb.

It is in the interest of neither Iran nor the United States (nor, for that matter, the rest of the world) that Iran be savaged by a nuclear strike, or that both Israel and Iran suffer such a fate. We know what would ensue: a traumatic destabilization of the Middle East with resounding political and military consequences around the globe, serious injury to the West’s oil supply and radioactive pollution of the earth’s atmosphere and water.

But should Israel’s conventional assault fail to significantly harm or stall the Iranian program, a ratcheting up of the Iranian-Israeli conflict to a nuclear level will most likely follow. Every intelligence agency in the world believes the Iranian program is geared toward making weapons, not to the peaceful applications of nuclear power. And, despite the current talk of additional economic sanctions, everyone knows that such measures have so far led nowhere and are unlikely to be applied with sufficient scope to cause Iran real pain, given Russia’s and China’s continued recalcitrance and Western Europe’s (and America’s) ambivalence in behavior, if not in rhetoric. Western intelligence agencies agree that Iran will reach the “point of no return” in acquiring the capacity to produce nuclear weapons in one to four years.

Which leaves the world with only one option if it wishes to halt Iran’s march toward nuclear weaponry: the military option, meaning an aerial assault by either the United States or Israel. Clearly, America has the conventional military capacity to do the job, which would involve a protracted air assault against Iran’s air defenses followed by strikes on the nuclear sites themselves. But, as a result of the Iraq imbroglio, and what is rapidly turning into the Afghan imbroglio, the American public has little enthusiasm for wars in the Islamic lands. This curtails the White House’s ability to begin yet another major military campaign in pursuit of a goal that is not seen as a vital national interest by many Americans.

Which leaves only Israel — the country threatened almost daily with destruction by Iran’s leaders. Thus the recent reports about Israeli plans and preparations to attack Iran (the period from Nov. 5 to Jan. 19 seems the best bet, as it gives the West half a year to try the diplomatic route but ensures that Israel will have support from a lame-duck White House).

The problem is that Israel’s military capacities are far smaller than America’s and, given the distances involved, the fact that the Iranian sites are widely dispersed and underground, and Israel’s inadequate intelligence, it is unlikely that the Israeli conventional forces, even if allowed the use of Jordanian and Iraqi airspace (and perhaps, pending American approval, even Iraqi air strips) can destroy or perhaps significantly delay the Iranian nuclear project.

Nonetheless, Israel, believing that its very existence is at stake — and this is a feeling shared by most Israelis across the political spectrum — will certainly make the effort. Israel’s leaders, from Prime Minister Ehud Olmert down, have all explicitly stated that an Iranian bomb means Israel’s destruction; Iran will not be allowed to get the bomb.

The best outcome will be that an Israeli conventional strike, whether failed or not — and, given the Tehran regime’s totalitarian grip, it may not be immediately clear how much damage the Israeli assault has caused — would persuade the Iranians to halt their nuclear program, or at least persuade the Western powers to significantly increase the diplomatic and economic pressure on Iran.

But the more likely result is that the international community will continue to do nothing effective and that Iran will speed up its efforts to produce the bomb that can destroy Israel. The Iranians will also likely retaliate by attacking Israel’s cities with ballistic missiles (possibly topped with chemical or biological warheads); by prodding its local clients, Hezbollah and Hamas, to unleash their own armories against Israel; and by activating international Muslim terrorist networks against Israeli and Jewish — and possibly American — targets worldwide (though the Iranians may at the last moment be wary of provoking American military involvement).

Such a situation would confront Israeli leaders with two agonizing, dismal choices. One is to allow the Iranians to acquire the bomb and hope for the best — meaning a nuclear standoff, with the prospect of mutual assured destruction preventing the Iranians from actually using the weapon. The other would be to use the Iranian counterstrikes as an excuse to escalate and use the only means available that will actually destroy the Iranian nuclear project: Israel’s own nuclear arsenal.

Given the fundamentalist, self-sacrificial mindset of the mullahs who run Iran, Israel knows that deterrence may not work as well as it did with the comparatively rational men who ran the Kremlin and White House during the cold war. They are likely to use any bomb they build, both because of ideology and because of fear of Israeli nuclear pre-emption. Thus an Israeli nuclear strike to prevent the Iranians from taking the final steps toward getting the bomb is probable. The alternative is letting Tehran have its bomb. In either case, a Middle Eastern nuclear holocaust would be in the cards.

Iran’s leaders would do well to rethink their gamble and suspend their nuclear program. Bar this, the best they could hope for is that Israel’s conventional air assault will destroy their nuclear facilities. To be sure, this would mean thousands of Iranian casualties and international humiliation. But the alternative is an Iran turned into a nuclear wasteland. Some Iranians may believe that this is a worthwhile gamble if the prospect is Israel’s demise. But most Iranians probably don’t.

Will do...not do.

I get wound up when my satchel grows light but all's good now.

Except that I'm right in the path of the Alaskan HAARP. I saw a very intense rainbow band right above me that resembled the ones videoed in China right before the quake.
There but for go I et al.

But listen to me! You must think me quite the batty bitty.

slick i dont know how to upload photos but from the same site they came from there is a soldier carrying a chemical warshell. just having it on the battlefield is incontrovertible proof of breaches of U.N and Geneva conventions on the arming and use of chemical shells with bio-logical/chemical agents.
these weapons ARE WMD when filled with nerve agents or bio's.
The most touching photo is of the rabbi giving this chemical shell a blessing before firing it, he then helps carry it before firing.
you can see by the difficulty they have in carrying it that it is filled.
it was reported throughout the palestinian refugee camps that unexplained sickness was rife and that they had heard the chemical shells discharging their payloads while airborne over the camps.
These same highly "religious"/"stupid for god" people had fired 155mm artillery shells into the refugee camps.
The most gracious thing you can do when fighting with another human being is to stop the fight or argument,preferably before violence starts but at some point when you can see it getting out of hand would show some intelligence.

go to this link i have posted this before beware there are many dead civilians .

in these photos http://www.radioislam.org/jewish-photos/index.htm

Here's how you post images:

Just change the url to the url of the pic

http://gnosticliberationfront.com/zionism_...ablishment1.htm

ZIONISM AND THE ESTABLISHMENT

OF THE MODERN POLISH STATE,

AN OBJECT LESSON IN HOW HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF

By Dr. Harrell Rhome

An earlier version of this article was published in the May-June 2003 Barnes Review historical magazine.
This new piece is re-edited and updated with photos and maps added.
© 2008 Harrell Rhome, Eagle Publishing Co.

Sometimes called a revisionist philosopher, Harrell Rhome researches and writes about history, culture, current events, world religions and metaphysics. His articles appear both in print and online. Write him at POB 6303 Corpus Christi TX 78466-6303 USA or email with Subscribe in the subject line to receive Truth In History And Current Events, Harrell’s e-magazine feature.

A NOTE ON SOURCES

In December 2002, this author received a unique “Christmas gift” from my Eagle Newsletter columnist Yancy Ames. Under the Freedom of Information Act, Ames obtained a number of formerly secret State Department documents dating from 1919-1920 (and some later ones as well) regarding the early 20th century Zionist movement. Some of the keys items were only declassified as late as 28 December 2001. As strange as it now seems under our current climate of political correctness, high officials in our government began an inquiry into (among other things) the connections between Zionism and the Bolshevik Russian Revolution of 1917. The existence of these documents formed the basis for The Jewish Threat: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army, a book by Joseph Bendersky, published in 2000. Bendersky intended his book as a refutation, but as is the case with more than a few works of this nature, when all the material is presented, some readers may come to other conclusions. As Ames said to me, three things quite are apparent, even to the casual reader of these documents: (1) Judaics were most active in financing and staffing Communism; (2) our government knew it and covered it up; (3) the cover-up continues today. Together with the various sources surveyed in the inquiry was the ever-controversial Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. This was before Henry Ford published the Protocols, and nothing indicates that Ford’s research staff had access to any of this then-secret, classified and unavailable material. But as intriguing as that may be, and though we shall refer to them, the Protocols are not the focus of this paper.

Rest of article here....
http://gnosticliberationfront.com/zionism_...ablishment1.htm

How about ###### Zionism & the Talmud

What is interesting about Halliburton is that the capture of Saddam was used by the CIA to cover up the Halliburton scandal. Mr Halliburton crusher.
A few days before Saddam was captured the news papers and television were filled with the news story of the month that Halliburton was caught defrauding the American public out of millions of dollars. I was following this story very closely when Saddam was captured the very next day. The capture of Saddam became the news story of the month completely removing the Halliburton scandal from our television screens. So the evidence shows that the CIA knew exactly where Saddam was hiding all along because the CIA put Saddam into power in the first place. The Jews have the ability to do this because they control the news media in America. Jews that control the CIA and the oil industry originally put Saddam into power in Iraq so they could have an excuse in invade Iraq and steal their oil and sell it here in the U.S at huge marked up prices. All Iraq is today is another Israel. If you look at a map of the Middle east in another 20 years the entire Middle east will be one gigantic state of Israel. This is more evidence that the Rockefellers who are Jews that created the CIA and dominate the oil iundustry in America destroyed the World Trade Towers that they had originally built to take us into Iraq in the first place. The Rockefellers also funded the creation of Israel. For more information on this you can visit my website at www.dualidentity.net

F*CK zionism before it F*CKS you?


Zionists Made A Deal
With The Devil
Accepting The 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion'
By Henry Makow, Ph.D
11-5-2

Under the 1935 Nuremberg Laws, only two flags were permitted in Nazi Germany. One was the swastika. The other was the blue and white banner of Zionism.

According to Lenni Brenner's online book Zionism in the Age of Dictators (Ch.7), the Zionist party was the only other political party in Nazi Germany that enjoyed a measure of freedom, and could publish a newspaper. The reason: Zionists and Nazis had a common interest, making German Jews go to Palestine. (http://www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/ch07.htm)

History is not always what you'd expect.

There are more shocking examples in Brenner's book (Chapters 24 & 25).

For instance, in November 1942, Rabbi Michael Dov-Ber Weismandel, a Jewish activist in Slovakia approached Adoph Eichmann's representative, Dieter Wisliceny: "How much money would be needed for all the European Jews to be saved?" Wisliceny went to Berlin and returned with an answer.

For a mere $2 million they could have all the Jews in Western Europe and the Balkans. Weismandel sent a courier to the World Zionist Organization in Switzerland. His request was refused. The official, Nathan Schwalb sent enough money to save only Weismandel and his cadre. He wrote:

"About the cries coming from your country, we should know that all the Allied nations are spilling much of their blood, and if we do not sacrifice any blood, by what right shall we merit coming before the bargaining table when they divide nations and lands at the war's end? ....for only with blood shall we get the land." (p.237)

Brenner writes that Zionism had come full turn. "Instead of Zionism being the hope of the Jews, their blood was to be the political salvation of Zionism" (p.238).

In Chapter 25, Brenner relates how Zionist leader Rezso Kasztner made a deal with Adolph Eichmann to save a few thousand hand -picked Zionists and wealthy Jews in return for deceiving and leading more than 750,000 Hungarian Jews to their doom. In 1954, when Kasztner was accused of collaborating, the Israeli government sprang to his defence.

Brenner documents how the Zionist and World Jewish leadership prevaricated and obstructed all efforts to save the Jews of Europe who apparently were worth more to them dead than alive.

I am Jewish and my family suffered from Nazi persecution. When I first heard this information, I immediately rejected it. It boggles the mind. However, as I learned more about the Illuminati's ancient plan for world domination with its satanic overtones and Masonic plan for rebuilding Solomon's Temple, I became more receptive.

I came to the conclusion that Jews must be sceptical of Zionist leaders who have used the holocaust to gain undeserved moral authority, and to bludgeon Jews and others into hysterical, unthinking conformity.

It is possible that Israel was set up for purposes that have nothing to do with the Jewish people, and that Israelis and Jews in general are being duped.

This is by way of introduction to a current controversy, which cuts to the heart of Jewish-Arab mistrust. It is over a lavishly produced 14-part television series based on the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion." It will be aired nightly during the peak viewing period of the Muslim Ramadan by the state-run Egyptian station, and a private satellite channel.

For Jews, the series entitled "A Rider Without a Horse" is proof of the Arabs' inveterate anti Semitism. For Jews, the "Protocols" is an anti Semitic booklet written in 1905 by Czar Nicholas II's secret police which describes an imaginary Jewish plot to take over the world.

For Arabs, the "Protocols" are confirmation of a Jewish desire to spread materialist values, destroy Islam and colonize the Middle East.

According to Hebrew University professor Meir Litvak, "Many Arab and Muslim writers see globalization as a threat to Arab culture and identity and fear that it will increase Western control of their economies and political systems." Associating globalization with "Jewish intrigues" makes it easier for the Arabs to explain why they lag behind in economics, technology and science, says Litvak. (Haaretz, Oct. 29,2002) (http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=224976

Calls from the US government to cancel the program on the grounds that it stokes hatred and bigotry were rebuffed by Cairo. So too were appeals to Arab leaders to condemn the anti-Semitism rife in the Egyptian media. A protest demonstration by Jewish organizations took place outside the Egyptian embassy in Washington Monday, November 4.

An Arab League spokesman rejected Israeli charges that the series is a violation of Cairo's commitment under the peace accord to shun anti-Israel incitement. Egyptian Information Minister Safwat el-Sherif declared that he could not see what the fuss was about. He denied that ìRiderî had any anti-Semitic content at all. ìOur media policy,î he says, ìis to respect all monotheistic religions.î

I don't know about the miniseries but I invite you to read "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" online) and decide about its authenticity and anti Semitism. (http://www.abbc.com/protocols/indexen.htm#protocol_7)

In my opinion, the Protocols are a master plan for what already has largely taken place.

Nesta Webster (World Revolution, pp.288-298) has shown that the Protocols are typical of many other Illuminati writings. It's true that the "Protocols" identify the source as largely Jewish. This may be a false scent, an attempt to scapegoat the whole Jewish people in order to protect a few bankers, their lackeys and allies. Historically the Illuminati is an occult secret society with strong aristocratic British, Aryan German, as well as Jewish financial and revolutionary elements.

If Jews became familiar with the history of the New World Order, (http://www.viewfromthewall.com/fwcover.htm#contents) we would recognize that Muslims are correct that "globalization" is a mask for a bizarre plot to enshrine the rule of the superrich under the aegis of Lucifer.

Islam is one of the last bastions of genuine God worship, the last major obstacle to pagan World Religion. The attack on Iraq is another step in the plan to destroy Islam, monopolize world resources and enslave humanity.

The cry of "anti Semitism" is being used to divert the world from this diabolical plot. By accepting the role of some apostate Jews, and their dupes, God-fearing Jews could unite with Muslims (and Christians) to bring the "blood sacrifice" to an end.


Henry Makow, Ph.D. is the inventor of the board game Scruples and the author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." (http://alongwaytogoforadate.com) His articles on feminism and the New World Order are archived on his web site www.savethemales.ca He welcomes comments at henrym@mts.net


if they will sacrifice their own brethren for their "cause" the rest of us should take note because they wont think twice about it.

Best way to fight them is to spread the work of people like Chris Bollyn, Daryl Bradford Smith & James Petras. Spread the word that Zionism is at the top of the power structure & that generalities like 'the globalists' & lies like the Queen of England owns the Federal Reserve & Muslims own the media from people like AJ won't do.

Except that none of those people support tv fakery research & probably hate us all as well. So those of us who support research into both Zionism & TV fakery are like the most hated people in America & probably in danger of being burned at the stake or something <_<

The following was written by a friend of mine -

" " " The Talmud is an ugly book filled with hate. It is this book that the Jewish faith is based on. In the Talmud it is ok for the Jews to lie to other races. The Jews fill that they are better than any others because of the teachings in the Talmud.

Is this the reason that many in the prison camps felt they could lie about there being gas chambers and crematoriums?
Is this why the dairy of Ann Frank was forged?
Is this why it is OK to bomb the USS Liberty?
Is this why it is OK to lie about the nuclear program in Israel?
Is this why the Palestinians were forcibly removed from their land?
Is this why the Jews in Israel feel they can invade Lebanon when ever the mood strikes them?
Is this why Jews can run over protesters with heavy moving equipment?

It is a culture of lies and disrespect for people. If one looks into 911 with an open mind one can see the Talmud. We can find the Neocons. Are they not mainly Jewish or if not they are strong supporters of Zionism. We can find the dancing Israelis and the Art students. The lack of respect for other people is found in the Talmud. Is it not a stretch that the influence of the Jewish religion brought about the attacks of 911? " " "

Keep in mind that i have no respect for the bible or christianity or muslimism either. my minor knowledge of judaism, christianity, and muslimism is sufficient to show me that the ulterior motive of these clubs is to consider themselves better than others, to the extent that they rationalize via provincial, jingoistic, inanity, that it is excusable for these clubs to kill non-members, and steal their resources.

people who follow these books of hypocrisy are the real terrorists, because they are adult-children who would rather follow someone elses lead, than figure things out for themselves. what these adult-children refuse to realize is that they are not only lead by masters above their existence, but that these very masters have them so enslaved, that these adult-children hug the pathetic notion that if those who disagree with them would only spend their lives reading these doctrines of genocide, that they would come to an understanding of self-omnipotence and would understand the self proclaimed excuse of killing those who are considered less than themselves. they murder via a superiority complex yet hypocritically consider themselves humble in they eyes of the lord.

the truth is - these clubs need to dissolve into nonexistence for the betterment of the world.
goodbye to christianity. goodbye to judaism. goodbye to muslimism.

i am tired and fed up with you hypocritical, self pitying, insecure, soap box bitching, attention craving, time wasting, adult-children.

"OH WHAT TANGLED WEBS WE WEAVE WHEN WE PRACTICE TO DECEIVE" - T.S. ELLIOTT

Well said.....

The Curse of Ham myth in the Talmud was also inspiration for the African slave trade which was run predominantly by Jews, another well kept secret. Check out a guy named Tony Martin & his video on Google/Youtube about it.

I tried to get in touch with Tony Martin several times over a year ago but he would not talk to me too much through email. He was saying that Jews had infiltrated his classroom and were entering his classroom at night and were trying to destroy his work about slavery.
I was one of the first people in the country to expose the ultra secret diamond industry in America and how the whole thing was connected to 911.
Jews in the CIA used diamonds to finance Al Queda instead of paying them with cash because diamonds can not be traced. Money has serial numbers that can be traced back to their source if at some point there was an investigation into 911. The key is though by paying the Al Queda operatives with diamonds it is solid proof that Jews were behind 911 because they are in complete control of the diamond industry in America.
An FBI agent John O'Neill who was put on the case after the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Towers discoverd that the CIA through Bill Clinton was financing these Al Queda operatives with diamonds from the DeBeers diamond company while they were taking flying lessons here in the United States. Bill Clinton had a former CIA agent Louie Freeh who was running the FBI at the time fire O'Neill because of this information and then got him a job at the World Trade Towers where O'Neill was killed. http://www.dualidentity.net/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTMp-YNaDdg

The wider conflict attacking iran will cause is what i think they are really after.

They want world control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLSdd166Cqg&feature=related

Mark Carter,

You seem to give a lot of creedence to "Al-Qaeda". Who do you believe did the London and Spain bombings? Al-Qaeda?

Al Qaeda (sorry) is a name affixed to Islamic Terrorists by Jews that hate Arabs. The CIA which is controlled by Jews has given them this name. Are their names really important. The CIA has a long history of framing people for events that they have done. If you go to the link below the third photograph down is a picture of Anwar Shaaban. This same photograph has been shown by the Media in the United States as Bin Laden several times, It sure looks like Bin Laden. I don't think that these CIA people really know who they are framing half the time.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?e...anwar_shaaban_1